
Code of Business Conduct
Conduct Our Code of Business Conduct defines how Swiber conducts business with our stakeholders – who include employees, customers, shareholders, vendors, government agencies, industry colleagues, the environment and the community as a whole – with the highest standards of ethics, integrity and responsibility. Individually and collectively, we at Swiber endeavor to uphold this Code strictly in our business dealings.
Download Code of Business Conduct
Board Committee

| Board Committee |
Executive Committee |
Audit Committee |
Remuneration Committee |
Nominating Committee |
| Raymond Goh |
Chairman |
|
|
|
| Jean Pers |
Member |
|
|
|
| Darren Yeo |
Member |
|
|
|
| Francis Wong |
Member |
Member |
|
|
| Yeo Jeu Nam |
|
Chairman |
Chairman |
Member |
| Oon Thian Seng |
|
Member |
Member |
Chairman |
| Chia Fook Eng |
|
Member |
Member |
Member |
Audit Committee Charter
The AC comprises Mr Yeo Jeu Nam, Mr Oon Thian Seng, Mr Chia Fook Eng and Mr Francis Wong. Save for Mr Francis Wong, an executive director of the Company, the other three members of the AC are independent non-executive directors. Mr Yeo Jeu Nam is the Chairman of the AC.
The AC is responsible for:
(a) reviewing the audit plans of the Company's external auditors;
(b) reviewing the reports of the Company's external auditors;
(c) reviewing the co-operation given by the Company's officers to the external auditors;
(d) reviewing the financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries before their submission to the Board;
(e) the quarterly, half-yearly and annual announcements as well as the related press releases on the results and financial position of the Company and the Group;
(f) nominating the Company's external auditors for re-appointment;
(g) approving the Company's internal audit plans;
(h) reviewing interested person transaction (if any);
(i) reviewing and considering transactions in which there may be potential conflicts of interests between the Group and its interested persons and recommending whether those who are in a position of conflict should abstain from participating in any discussion or deliberations of the Board or voting on resolutions of the Board or the shareholders in relation to such transactions;
(j) reviewing and approving procedures to hedge the exposure to foreign currency fluctuations (if any); and
(k) reviewing the findings of internal investigations into matters where there is any suspected fraud or irregularity or failure of internal controls or infringement of any Singapore law, rule or regulation which has or is likely to have a material impact on the Group's results of operation and/or financial position.
The AC has the express power to conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within its terms of reference, has full access to and co-operation by Management. The AC has full discretion to invite any other directors or executive directors to attend its meetings and to ensure that adequate resources are available to enable it to discharge its function properly. As at the date of this Annual Report, the AC has met with the external and internal auditors once separately without the presence of Management to review any area of audit concern. Ad-hoc AC meetings may be carried out from time to time, as circumstances require.
The Company has implemented a whistle blowing policy that will provide well-defined and accessible channels in the Group through which employees may raise concerns about improper conduct within the Group. The AC will review arrangements by which staff of the Company may, in confidence, raise concerns about possible improprieties in matters of financial reporting or other matters. The AC's objectives are to ensure that arrangements are in place for the independent investigation of such matters and for appropriate follow-up action.
Remuneration Committee Charter
The RC comprises Mr. Yeo Jeu Nam, Mr. Oon Thian Seng, and Mr Chia Fook Eng who are independent non-executive directors. Mr. Yeo Jeu Nam is the Chairman of the RC.
The RC is responsible for:
(a) recommending to the Board a framework of remuneration for the directors and key executives;
(b) determining specific remuneration packages for each executive directors; and
(c) reviewing all aspects of remuneration, including directors’ fees, salaries, allowances, bonuses, the options to be issued under the share option scheme, the awards to be granted under the share plan and other benefit in-kind.
The Chairman of the RC reviews, for recommendation to the Board, the specific remuneration package for an Executive Director or senior management staff. There are appropriate and meaningful measures in place for the purpose of assessing the performance of Executive Directors and senior management staff. Each member of the RC does not participate in any decision concerning his own remuneration.
Nominating Committee Charter
The NC comprises Mr Oon Thian Seng, Mr Yeo Jeu Nam, and Mr Chia Fook Eng as members who are independent nonexecutive directors. Mr Oon Thian Seng is the Chairman of the NC. The NC is responsible for:
(a) re-nominating directors (including independent directors) taking into consideration each director’s contribution and performance;
(b) determining annually whether or not a director is independent;
(c) deciding whether or not a director is able to and has been adequately carrying out his duties as a director; and
(d) proposing a set of objective performance criteria to the Board for approval and implementation, to evaluate the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and the contribution of each director to the effectiveness of the Board.
All directors are subject to retirement in accordance with the provisions of the Company’s Articles of Association whereby one third of the Directors are required to retire (or if their number is not a multiple of three, the number nearest to but not less than one third) and subject themselves to re-election by shareholders at every Annual General Meeting (AGM). A newly appointed director must retire and submit himself for re-election at the next AGM following his appointment and, thereafter, shall be taken into account in determining the number of directors who are to retire by rotation.
Governance Policies
Policy on Business Related Conduct
Swiber Group of Companies’ directors and employees are expected to carry out their duties as required and conduct themselves in a professional manner at all times and act in ways that bring credit to themselves, the Company and the public we serve. We are required to observe high standards of business and personal ethics, honestly and with integrity, in fulfilling our responsibilities and to comply with all applicable laws and regulations. Being a public listed company, we are socially responsible in ensuring that this is practiced within the organisation, consistent with the company’s code of ethics.
Accounting Practice Reporting
• Fraud whether actual or suspected or deliberate error in preparing, evaluation or review of any financial statements of the Group;
• Fraud whether actual or suspected or deliberate error in recording and maintenance of the financial records of the Group;
• Actual or suspected deficiencies in or non-compliance with the Group’s internal controls and procedures;
• Any misrepresentation whether actual or suspected by an officer or auditors regarding a matter contained or required to be contained in the Company’s financial records, reports or audit reports.
Non-Accounting Practice Reporting
• Misappropriation of Cash Sales
• Misuse of Petty Cash
• Unauthorised Discount
• Falsifying Attendance record
• Pilferage of Stock in Trade
• Abuse of Authority for Personal Gain
• A criminal offence has been/is likely to be committed
• The health or safety of any individual has been/is likely to be endangered
• The environment has been/is likely to be damaged
• Discrimination or physical abuse against any member of staff or service recipient is taking place
• Discrimination is occurring to any member of staff or service recipient on grounds of sex, race or disability
• Any conflict of interest in any activity that is, or appears to be, opposed to the best interest of the Company
The Company has established this Code so as to enable you to raise your concerns about such malpractice(s) at an early stage and in the right way. The Company would rather that you raised the matter when it is just a concern rather than wait for concrete proof.
If something is troubling you, that you think we should know about or look into, please use this policy. If, however, you are aggrieved about your personal position, please approach your Manager or Chief Financial Officer going through the human resource channel. This Whistle Blowing Code is primarily for concerns where the interests of others or of the Company itself are at risk.
If in doubt, just raise it.
Reporting Allegation
Information about known or suspected violations by any employee should be reported promptly to the Lead Independent Director and Audit Committee Chairman:
Mr Yeo Jeu Nam
Lead Independent Director and Audit Committee Chairman
Handphone no: (65) 96826128 or Email: jeunam@swiber.com
What Assurance Do You Get?
If you raise a concern under this Code, you will not be at risk of losing your job or suffering any form of retribution as a result, provided that:
• the disclosure is made in good faith
• you reasonably believe that information, and any allegations contained in it, are substantially true
• you are not acting for personal gain.
The Company will not tolerate the harassment or victimisation of anyone raising a genuine concern. However, we recognise that you may nonetheless want to raise a concern in confidence under this code. If you ask us to protect your identity by keeping your confidence, we will not disclose it without your consent. If the situation arises where we are not able to resolve the concern without revealing your identity (for instance because your evidence is needed in court), we will discuss with you whether and how we can proceed.
Remember that if you do not tell us who you are, it will be much more difficult for us to look into the matter or to protect your position or to give you feedback.
Accordingly, while we will consider anonymous reports, this policy is not well suited to concerns raised anonymously.
How Will The Company Respond?
If the concern is raised verbally, the person receiving the information should put it in writing as soon as practicable to ensure that it properly reflects the concerns that have been raised. The employee must also indicate if the concern is to be treated in confidence. The limit of that confidence will be checked out by the person receiving the information. The relevant person and/or the Human Resource Manager will also ensure that the Company’s management receives adequate details of the employee’s concerns for the purpose of corporate recording and monitoring purposes.
Once you have told us your concern, we will look into it to assess initially what action should be taken. This may involve an internal inquiry or a more formal investigation. We will tell you who may be handling the matter, how you can contact him/her and whether your further assistance may be needed. If you request it, we will write to you summarizing your concern(s) and setting out how we propose to handle it.
When you raise the concern you may be asked how you think the concern(s) might best be resolved. If you do not have any personal interest in the matter, we do ask that you tell us at the outset. Should your concern be best handled by another approach such as through the human resource development channel, we will tell you.
While the purpose of this Code is to enable us to investigate possible malpractice and take appropriate steps to deal with it, we will give you as much feedback as we properly can. If requested, we will confirm our response to you in writing. Please note, however, that we may not be able to tell you the precise action we take, where this would infringe a duty of confidence owed by us to someone else.
Concerns or allegations, which fall within the scope of specific procedures, will normally be referred for consideration under that relevant procedure. Some concerns may be resolved by agreed action without the need for investigation. If urgent action is required, this will be taken before any investigation is conducted.
Where appropriate, the matters raised may:
Be investigated by management, internal audit, a committee set up by the Board of Directors or through the disciplinary process be referred to the police be referred to the external auditor form the subject of an independent inquiry.
Usually, within four weeks of a concern being raised, the person looking into the concern will write to you:
• acknowledging that the concern has been received
• indicating how The Company proposes to deal with the matter
• giving an estimate of how long it will take to provide a full response
• saying whether any initial enquiries have been made
• supplying information on support available to you and Saying whether further investigations will take place and if not, why.
Subject to any legal constraints, the relevant employee will normally be informed of the final outcome of the investigation.
On behalf of the Board of Directors,
Raymond Goh
Executive Chairman and
Group Chief Executive Officer
|